First of all captures the attention ‘s the comparatively narrow and you can significant method the fresh letters was composed. The latest lines of one’s ?, instance, are very brief you to lined up 10 Roberts reads an excellent ? rather than a keen ?. Despite the uncial handwriting, new ? isn’t authored like an investment Latin “M”, but alternatively is similar to several adjacent “1”s inside Latin cursive; the crossbar of your own ? is in the higher third away from the newest page. The ?, like the ?, is extremely unusual and you will represents good Latin “V”, because ? corresponds to an ugly “V”; the usual extension of best diagonal to reach the top kept doesn’t result. Brand new ? include two separate pieces. Discover an evident gap amongst the vertical downstroke as well as the two diagonals, which happen to be drawn in that brush. This kind of the ? exists, like, in the a good psalm fragment throughout the very first 1 / 2 of the fresh new 8th century, P.Amst. We 21 fourteen . Brand new crossbar of your own ? created quite high right up is also utilized in an excellent liturgical diary on seasons 535/6, the fresh P.Oxy. 1357 16 . The type of the brand new ? thereon papyrus also resembles the latest mode found in P.Ryl. III 470. The new ? in this papyrus, but not, compared to P.Ryl. III 470, is created as the a continuous letter. The brand new ? for the P.Oxy. 1357 enjoys a diagonal coronary arrest to the top left, while in the fragment P.Ryl. III 470 it is authored particularly a triangle. The fresh new aforementioned brand of the fresh ?, a comparable type of the newest ?, the above mentioned-mentioned style of the fresh ? and you can an enthusiastic ? which have also short shots can also be found in P.Berol 13269, that’s assigned to the seventh/8th Century sixteen . P.Lond. 1817, old in the 6th century, still alternates between your uncial and the significantly more than-mentioned style of the new ?, and similarities into Manchester fragment exist pertaining to the ? while the ?, as the gap between them areas of brand new ? inside P. Lond Estonya gelin ajansД±. 1817 isn’t as highest as in P.Ryl. III 470 17 . According to research by the comparative texts quoted, P.Ryl. III, 470 belongs involving the sixth and you may seventh centuries. The 5th century is actually unlikely because day from provider, however, cannot be entirely ruled-out. The usage brown ink, where there’s absolutely no research ahead of the fourth century, and activities contained in this assistance 18 .
The bottom line is it can be said that a matchmaking into 3rd otherwise 4th century must be considered to be really not very likely
thirteen. From the finishes of your shots out of ?, ?, ?, ?, and you can ? is small specks of ink that provide the text a fake, otherwise, while the Lobel place it, attractive looks. To own an equivalent experience in phenomenal messages, cf. p. seven col. 17; pt 10; p. thirty-six col. 2; P. thirty-six Col. eight during the: K. Klassendanz, Papyri Graecae Magicae. Perish griechischen Zauberpapyri (=The new Greek Enchanting Papyri) II, Stuttgart next ed. 1974.
In terms of paleographic relationships, it ought to be noted you to definitely majuscule manuscripts, while the Roberts themselves produces in the commentary, are difficult to go out
18. I am indebted so you’re able to H. Harrauer into talk. Find together with V. Gardthausen, Griechische Palaographie 1: Das Buchwesen i am Altertum und im byzantinischen Mittelalter, Leipzig next ed. 1911, 203-217. He writes (p.205) one to in the 5th century Ad “a brownish, plus steel ink came into explore” and you will prices Schubart within this framework when you look at the note 5 for the same webpage, whom speaks off a brownish-red ink , that can be found throughout the papyri about last century Offer. At the same time, the greater rewarding brown ink was only utilized for extremely important messages.
Comentarios recientes